Handayani, Nurul Fitri (2025) Penegakkan Hukum Terhadap Praktik Dokteroid Di Indonesia. Masters thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.
|
Text
skripsi_231022139_watermark.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (3MB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
The practice of doctoroids, namely the actions of individuals claiming to be medical personnel without having official qualifications and licenses, has become a serious problem in the Indonesian health system. The rampant cases of this not only endanger patient safety but also damage public trust in the medical profession. This phenomenon arises due to several factors, including limited access to health services in remote areas, low public awareness in verifying the credentials of medical personnel, and weak supervision from the relevant authorities. Some cases even involve organized modes, such as falsification of official documents or collusion with licensed health workers. Although Indonesia has a legal umbrella such as Law Number 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice and Law Number 36 of 2009 concerning Health, law enforcement against perpetrators of doctoroids still faces various challenges. The main formulation in this study is what forms of doctoroids occur in Indonesia, how the law is enforced against perpetrators of doctoroids in Indonesia, and what is the basis for the judge's considerations in sentencing perpetrators of the crime of doctoroids in Case Number 1747/Pid.B/2023/PN Sby. This research is classified as normative legal research. Normative legal research is a scientific research procedure to find the truth based on the logic of legal science from its normative side, namely research conducted by analyzing library materials or document materials. From the research that has been conducted by the author, it has been shown that doctoroids in Indonesia appear in various forms that threaten patient safety and damage the integrity of the health system. The most common practices involve falsification of identity, such as the use of fake STR (Registration Certificate) or SIP (Practice License), as well as claims of a doctor's degree without official qualifications. Law enforcement against perpetrators of doctoroids in Indonesia still faces various challenges even though it has a legal basis through Law No. 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice. The legal process often encounters difficulties in providing evidence, low public awareness to report, and limited supervision in remote areas. In sentencing perpetrators of doctoroid crimes, the panel of judges at the Surabaya District Court based their considerations on three main aspects, namely the legal aspect, the factual aspect of the trial, and the sociological aspect.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Masters) |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | Contribution Contributors NIDN/NIDK Thesis advisor Susanti, Heni UNSPECIFIED Thesis advisor Sanjaya, Zulkarnain UNSPECIFIED |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Doctoroids, Malpractice, Law Enforcement |
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | > Ilmu Hukum S.2 |
| Depositing User: | Mia Darmiah |
| Date Deposited: | 21 Jan 2026 02:49 |
| Last Modified: | 21 Jan 2026 02:49 |
| URI: | https://repository.uir.ac.id/id/eprint/32908 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
