Mardomu, Jagar (2025) Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pekerja Korban Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Pada Pt.riau Abadi Sentosa ( Studi Putusan Kasasi Nomor 2 K/pdt.sus-phi/2023 Jo Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor 8/pdt.sus-phi/2022/pn Pbr. Masters thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 211021047.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (6MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Termination of Employment that occurs due to workers who experience serious illness for a fairly long period of time. The layoffs that occurred to workers at PT. Riau Abdi Sentosa (RAS) in Pekanbaru, which is a company engaged in the distribution of basic necessities. Where there was a worker who had worked for more than 10 years, but at one time the worker experienced a serious illness that made him unable to carry out work activities as usual. Based on the background above, the main problems in this study are 2 (two), namely first, How is the legal protection for workers who are victims of layoffs at PT. RAS (study of cassation decision number 2 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI / 2023 Jo decision number 8/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2022/ PN Pbr) and second, How is the resolution of disputes against workers who are victims of layoffs at PТ. RAS (study of cassation decision number 2 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2023 Jo decision number 8/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2022/PN Pbr). 2 This study uses a normative legal research method by examining library materials, tracing literature related to the subject matter, while the nature of this study is descriptive analytical to provide a more precise picture and data regarding legal protection for workers. The objects of the study are Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower Jo CHAPTER IV Manpower Law No. 6 of 2023 concerning Job Creation and cassation decision No. K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2023 Jo decision number 8/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2022/PN Pbr. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal data sources, qualitative data analysis, namely analyzing by describing and then comparing the data with laws and regulations or expert opinions. The next method of data collection is carried out deductively, namely drawing from general things to specific things. The results of this study concluded that the first-level decision assessed that the reason the worker was unable to attend work at the company was true because of illness based on a doctor's certificate and evidence of a request for permission by the worker to his superior. Meanwhile, the cassation level decision of the judge assessed that the worker was proven to have been absent since May 31, 2021, this was because the worker's sick certificate stating that he was being treated in hospital was since June 3, 2021 (vide evidence T-3). Because there is a time difference from May 31, 2021 to June 3, 2021, the element of the worker having violated the Company Regulations is fulfilled.

Actions (login required)

View Item