Hasna, Marwah Farhana (2024) Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Penggelapa Dana di Pengadilan Tinggi Pekanbaru (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 325/Pid.B/2023/Pt Pbr). Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 201010573.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

As time goes by, criminals in committing their crimes have used various methods to get what they want from other people, namely in ways that of course violate legal provisions and laws that are highly respected in Indonesia. A person who has a position in a work relationship is considered vulnerable to being involved in a criminal case of embezzlement. The criminal act of embezzlement has elements of unlawfulness, including intentionally possessing property belonging to another person without the owner's knowledge, which is used for personal gain and the object is already in his or her control. Thus, the formulation of the problem in this research is: First, how is the application of material criminal law to the crime of embezzlement of funds at the Pekanbaru High Court (Case Study Decision Number 325/PID.B/2023/ PT Pbr) ¬Second, what are the judge's considerations in sentencing? Criminal Justice in Criminal Case Decision No. 325/PID.B/2023/PT Pbr. This research uses normative legal research methods. The types of data in research use primary data, secondary data and tertiary data. The collection technique is that the researcher obtains data originating from books, laws and regulations related to the problem. In this research, the analysis used is qualitative, which is a research method that produces descriptive data. The judge's legal consideration of the perpetrators of the crime of embezzlement together, decision number 325/PID.B/2023/PT Pbr was also appropriate, because it rejected the appeal request from the Public Prosecutor, strengthening the decision of the Pekanbaru District Court Number 290/Pid.B/2023 /PN Pbr, dated June 7 2023, determines the period of arrest and detention that the Defendant has served, is deducted in full from the sentence imposed, determines that the Defendant remains in detention, charges the defendant at both levels of court at the appeal level a case fee of IDR 3. 000.00 (three thousand rupiah).

Actions (login required)

View Item