Putri, Wita Yusmei (2023) Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pelaksanaan Pemusnahan Barang Bukti Narkotika Golongan I Di Wilayah Hukum Negeri Rokan Hilir. Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 161010049.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (4MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Narcotics confiscated objects that have received status determination and have been decided by courts that have permanent legal force are still very much not immediately destroyed but stored first. Because they were not immediately destroyed, the narcotic confiscated objects were stored in the State confiscated objects storage house. This risks irregularities where the confiscated goods can be circulated again in the community. Destruction of Narcotics Confiscated Objects that should be directly destroyed by the prosecutor's office which is one of the authorized elements in the executory process against the judge's decision which has permanent legal force. Any narcotics evidence confiscated, found and handed over by the public to the authorities must be destroyed immediately. This is in line with the realization of the implementation of national policies and strategies which state that the destruction of narcotics evidence as soon as possible is one of the efforts to eradicate narcotics abuse in Indonesia. In the thesis entitled “Juridical Analysis of the Implementation of the Destruction of Class I Narcotics Evidence in the Jurisdiction of the Rokan Hilir State Prosecutor's Office”, it aims to determine the Implementation of the Destruction of Class I Narcotics Evidence in the Jurisdiction of the Rokan Hilir State Prosecutor's Office and to determine the Inhibiting Factors for the Implementation of the Destruction of Class I Narcotics Evidence in the Jurisdiction of the Rokan Hilir State Attorney's Office. The method used to answer the problems mentioned above is to use empirical legal research methods, which is a data collection technique, where researchers make direct observations to the object of research to see closely the activities carried out. While viewed from its nature, this research is descriptive analytical. The results of the study showed that the Destruction of evidence carried out by the Rokan Hilir State Prosecutor's Office was generally the same as the procedure applied in Rupbasan, but the procedure prioritized effectiveness in all stages of storage of confiscated objects. Evidence is stored in a special room with an ordinary key and managed by the Rokan Hilir State Prosecutor's Office evidence room officer. The storage of narcotic-specific evidence is slightly different, with drug evidence stored separately from general evidence. From the results of the study, several factors were found that became obstacles in the implementation of the destruction of evidence at the Rokan Hilir State Prosecutor's Office, including: a) The location of the State Confiscated Property Storage House which was inadequate and not strategic; b) Inadequate storage of confiscated objects; c) Cost Constraints; d) Troublesome Destruction Procedures; e) The time allotted to carry out the extermination is very short.

Actions (login required)

View Item