Shanty, Shanty (2024) Implementasi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Semarang Nomor: 215/pdt.g/2021/pn.smg Terhadap Hak Dan Kedudukan Anak Di Luar Perkawinan. Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 221013032.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Every child born in this world should have the right to receive recognition from their biological parents as a biological child. It is inappropriate and unfair when the law stipulates that a child born from sexual intercourse outside of marriage only has a relationship with the woman as her mother, while the man who has the biological relationship is freed from his responsibility as a father. The formulation of the problem in this research is firstly how to implement the Semarang District Court decision Number: 215/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Smg regarding the rights and position of children outside of marriage, secondly how the judge considers the Semarang District Court decision Number: 215/Pdt. G/2021/PN.Smg. This research method includes normative legal research, namely legal research carried out by examining library materials or secondary data. In terms of its nature, this research is descriptive analysis, namely collecting information about the status or symptoms according to what happened when the research was carried out in detail. Drawing conclusions is deductive to inductive. The results of the research, firstly, are the implementation of the Semarang District Court decision no. 215/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Smg regarding the rights and position of children outside of marriage that have not been implemented properly, dwangsom must be implemented and forced money must be paid. Second, the judge's consideration of the verdict, the Plaintiff's argument that there was an Unlawful Act committed by the Defendant, not recognizing him as a biological child and refusing to undergo a DNA test. From the evidence and witnesses, the facts in the trial stated that the child was the result of a relationship between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, so that the Panel of Judges in its verdict stated that the Defendant had committed an Unlawful Act.

Actions (login required)

View Item