Syahputra, Muhammad Adhyaksa (2025) Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dana Badan Layanan Umum Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau Tahun 2019 (studi Kasus Putusan Nomor:22/pid.sus-tpk/2024/pn Pbr). Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 211010496.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Corruption is one of the serious problems faced by Indonesia, especially in the management of state finances. Corruption does not only occur in the government sector, but also in higher education institutions that are supposed to be the pillars of human resource development. One of the cases that has surfaced is the alleged corruption of the Public Service Agency (BLU) funds of the State Islamic University (UIN) Sultan Syarif Kasim (Suska) Riau in the 2019 fiscal year. The formulation of the problem in this research is How is the proof of the criminal act of corruption committed by the Rector of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau State Islamic University in Case Number: 22/Pid/Sus-TPK/2024/PN Pbr and How is the Legal Consideration of the Panel of Judges in the verdict on the criminal act of corruption by the Rector of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau State Islamic University in the case. The method used in this research is normative research method. In terms of its nature, this research is descriptive analysis. The data sources used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The method of drawing conclusions in this study uses the deductive method, namely drawing conclusions from general to specific things. From the results of research and discussion, the authors find that the Corruption Evidence of the General Service Agency Fund of the State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau in 2019 in Case No. 22/Pid/SusTPK/2024/PN Pbr is based on witness testimony as many as 12, expert testimony of 1 person, letter evidence consisting of 3577 items of the defendant's letter, instructions and testimony of the defendant in accordance with the provisions of Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and the Corruption Act where the evidence at trial has proven that the defendant committed the crime of misuse of the 2019 General Service Agency Budget of the State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau. And the consideration in the panel of judges was too lenient both in the imposition of imprisonment, which the judge should have decided on a higher sentence for the defendant because the impact of the defendant's actions could set a bad precedent in society and not provide good education in society due to the same actions, especially corruption crimes because the defendant's sentence was too lenient.

Actions (login required)

View Item