Maisaroh, Siti (2023) Penerapan Persidangan Secara Elektronik Pada Pengadilan Agama Pekanbaru. Masters thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 201022154.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (2MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The Supreme Court in supporting changes to a simpler, faster and cheaper judicial system is by issuing Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2018 which was later revised into Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2019 which requires all court areas in Indonesia including the Pekanbaru Religious Court to be able to implement trial electronically (E-Litigation). The main problem in this study is how to implement electronic trials at the Pekanbaru Religious Court and what are the obstacles to implementing electronic trials at the Pekanbaru religious court This research method is a type of sociological legal research and is descriptive in nature. Empirical research uses legal materials consisting of primary data, namely data obtained directly from sources in the field and secondary data, namely data obtained from library materials which are divided into primary legal materials, secondary legal materials. This research was conducted in this study the authors obtained from the Panel of Judges of the Pekanbaru Religious Court, and Lawyers. Implementation of electronic trials at the Pekanbaru Religious Court, the ECourt system, namely a court instrument as a form of service to the community online which aims to make it easier for the community to carry out the judicial process. At the stage of using E-Court: 1. Case Registration (E-Filing), 2. Estimated Down Payment (E-Skum). 3. Obtain Case Number. 4. Online Summons of Parties (ESummon) 5. Electronic Trials (E-Litigation). 6. Electronic Copy of Decision (ECopy) 7. Electronic Signature (E-Sign) Copy of document signing. Obstacles to the implementation of electronic trials at the Pekanbaru Religious Court were tested with the theory of legal effectiveness, so it can be concluded that there are 4 (four) factors that have not been effectively implemented, namely consisting of "the legal factors themselves, law enforcement factors, community factors, and cultural factors" and only there is 1 (one) factor that is effectively implemented in the implementation of this E-Litigation, namely "the factor of facilities or facilities that support law enforcement. In addition to the above obstacles that impede the implementation of the electronic justice system includes elements of the legal system, namely legal substance, legal culture, understanding of digitalization, human resources, infrastructure.

Actions (login required)

View Item