Al Khudri, Al Khudri (2024) Pemanggilan Para Pihak Sebelum Dan Sesudah Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 7 Tahun 2022 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Tentang Administrasi Perkara Dan Persidangan Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik. Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 191010372.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Releasing summons for parties litigating in court is carried out by bailiffs and substitute bailiffs as regulated in Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2019 concerning Electronic Administration of Cases and Trials in Court. In civil procedural law, relaas is categorized as an authentic deed based on Article 165 HIR, Article 285 R.Bg, and Article 1868 of the Civil Code. The information contained in the summons shows what day, date and time they will attend the trial process. So the bailiff's job is to ensure that the court is accepted by the litigants, except that under certain conditions the court may be given to other people, such as the village/subdistrict head or village/subdistrict officials. However, there has been a change in the terms of summons, no longer carried out by substitute bailiffs/bailiffs, but instead using the services of a registered letter delivery service provider determined by the Supreme Court based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 7 of 2022 concerning Amendments to Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2019 concerning Administration of Cases and Trials in Court. Electronically. This change has an impact on whether the person concerned accepts the summons or not, making it legal and proper to become invalid. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the procedures for summoning the parties before and after Supreme Court Regulation Number 7 of 2022 concerning Amendments to Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2019 concerning Electronic Administration of Cases and Trials in Court. The type of research used is library research, that is, a method of collecting data by understanding and studying theories from various literature related to vocation relations. Judging from its nature, it is a qualitative descriptive aimed at describing and illustrating especially the procedures for summons before and after changes to Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2019. The research results show that before the changes to Perma No. 1 of 2019, summoning the parties is the duty and responsibility of the Bailiff/Substitute Bailiff to ensure that the summons reaches the parties involved in the case. Meanwhile, after the amendment to Perma no. 1 of 2019 became Perma No. 7 of 2022 states that if the electronic domicile cannot be found then the summons is replaced with a registered letter which is no longer delivered by the Bailiff / Substitute Bailiff but uses the services of a delivery service provider, in this case PT POS Indonesia (Persero).

Actions (login required)

View Item