Afrida Wahyu Sumita, Nur (2024) Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Menggunakan Metode Pembanding Mediasi Dalam Dan Luar Di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Kampar. Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 201010041.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (2MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Alternatives for resolving land disputes include mediation, conciliation, negotiation, which by means of this mediation has been regulated in the rules that are the authority in resolving this mediation, the National Land Agency (BPN). at the Kampar district land office. Apart from that, to guarantee reducing the number of unsuccessful mediations, to help the community in resolving land disputes. Based on the background above, the author is interested in conducting research with the first problem formulation, how to resolve land disputes using a comparison method of mediation within and outside the Kampar district office, secondly what factors are found in the implementation of land dispute resolution using a comparison method within and outside the district land office Kampar. The research method that the author uses is observational research by means of a survey, meaning that the author conducts research directly at the research location to obtain the necessary information and data. This research takes samples from the population using interviews with 6 respondents, namely the head of the dispute section, the mediator and 4 disputants and questionnaires as the main data collection tools. The descriptive nature of the research means that the author provides a detailed description of mediation comparisons outside the Kampar district land office. The results of the research are that the resolution of internal and external land disputes and the inhibiting factors encountered by the Kampar district land office were not optimal, the implementation of which was that both parties agreed to mediate, but in practice one of the parties was not present. The parties were still afraid to negotiate first. Before carrying out mediation, because one party was emotional, no one could mediate and thought that the results of the agreement between the parties were invalid, therefore the disputing parties chose mediation to resolve land disputes. One of the inhibiting factors is that the defendant did not come, resulting in 3 summons so that the dispute between the parties continued to court.

Actions (login required)

View Item