Karismen, Yudi (2021) Peningkatan Profesionalisme Penyidik dan Antisipasi dalam Menghadapi Praperadilan. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 3 (2). pp. 279-294.

Text 1. Peningkatan profesionalisme penyidik dan antisipasi dalam menghadapi praperadilan.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (336kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Pretrial is the authority of the District Court to examine and decide on whether or not an arrest and/ or detention is valid is the request of a suspect or his family or other party or the power of a suspect; whether valid or not the termination of the investigation or termination of prosecution at the request of law and justice; and requests for compensation or rehabilitation by the suspect or his family or other parties or their proxies whose cases are not brought to trial. By looking at legal phenomena as described in the background above, the authors are interested in making the subject matter in this research. What should be take into account in conducting pretrial. First, anticipation of pretrial can be carried out starting from the investigation process carried out by the police as investigators. Investigation aims to find and collect evidence to make a crime clear, investigators are authorized to carry out seizures.. Secondly, the Things to Look Out for Investigators as Anticipating Pretrial is concerning the Ethics of Investigation. An investigator in carrying out his duties has a legal corridor that must be obeyed and formally regulated and how the procedures for carrying out the tasks in the investigation. This means that investigators are bound to the regulations, legislation, and provisions that apply in carrying out their duties. In carrying out the investigation process, opportunities for deviating or misusing authority for a particular purpose are not impossible to occur, which is why all criminalist experts place the ethics of investigation as part of the professionalism that must be possessed by an investigator.

Actions (login required)

View Item