Representasi Sikap dan Pergerakan Organisasi-Organisasi dalam Novel Rumah Kaca (Analisis Wacana Kritis)

Candra, Muhammad (2018) Representasi Sikap dan Pergerakan Organisasi-Organisasi dalam Novel Rumah Kaca (Analisis Wacana Kritis). Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

	Text abstrak.pdf Download (396kB)
	Text kata_pengantar.pdf Download (380kB)
	Text daftar_isi.pdf Download (311kB)
	Text bab1.pdf Download (255kB)
	Text bab2.pdf Download (512kB)
	Text bab3.pdf Download (372kB)
	Text bab4.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (868kB) | Request a copy
	Text bab5.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (321kB) | Request a copy
	Text daftar_pustaka.pdf Download (323kB)

Abstract

This research takes object in novel Rumah Kaca that is Attitude and Movement of Organization which represented by its author, Pramoedya Ananta Toer. Attitudes and movements what it mean is primarily against colonialism and all its supporting institutions. The organizations are, among the others; Sjarikat Islam, Boedi Molejo (Budi Utomo), Indische Partij, and also about the imaging of the leadership of each the organizations. Then to find out deeply and extensively, not only the text (Novel Rumah Kaca) is merely analyzed but also about the author and the context of the creation of the novel. For that researcher use Critical Discourse Analysis with model analysis of Teun A. Van Dijk. This model of analysis outlines three dimensions; text analysis, analysis of social cognition, and analysis of social context. Data collection using documentation method and literature study, while data analysis using introspective and corpus analysis method. The results themselves find in the first dimension (text) that the author tends to side with his organizations and leadership that are subversive and radical against the Dutch colonial government. Conversely, whoever being submissively even moderate ones are depicted badly by not giving importance to freedom from colonialism. In the second dimension (social cognition) researcher knows the author as a rationalist who tends to Marxism. He-himself claimed to be neither a Marxist nor a man who rejected colonialism and capitalism. Whereas in the third dimension (social context), he became a political prisoner while working on his works, and when he left prison and published all his works, the government at that time immediately prohibited the publication of all his works including this novel.

Actions (login required)

View Item