Tinjauan Yuridis Kedudukan Perppu Nomor 01 Tahun 2020 Tentang Kebijakan Keuangan Negara Dan Stabilitas Sistem Keuangan Untuk Penanganan Pandemi Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid- 19) Berdasarkan Pasal 22 Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Di Indonesia

Shirotol, Ahmad (2021) Tinjauan Yuridis Kedudukan Perppu Nomor 01 Tahun 2020 Tentang Kebijakan Keuangan Negara Dan Stabilitas Sistem Keuangan Untuk Penanganan Pandemi Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid- 19) Berdasarkan Pasal 22 Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Di Indonesia. Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Preview

Text 191021053.pdf Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

As of a Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perppu) the number 01 year 2020 of state finance policy and the stability of the system of finance for treatment of the corona disease virus 2019 (covid 19 is controversial as this development is defined as a clause in the state of law, it therefore makes the policy carried out by the government legally immune to the law. From that background, researchers are the subject of this problem: first of all, how does the government's zero-one regulatory rule (perppu) 2020 no. 01 year on government finance policy and the stability of its monetary system for handling the corona virus disease 2019 pandemic (covid - 19) based on article 22 of the 1945 constitution in Indonesia? Second, how is the urgency of 2020 The number 01 , about national financial policies and the stability of financial systems for handling the corona virus pandemic 2019 (covid-19) in Indonesia? This type of study belongs to the normative law study class, a legal study done by the study of the material of primary law. Secondary legal material, and tertiary legal material. The data of the law is systematically compiled, analyzed and later drawn to conclusions in relation to the subject matter under study. The drawback of conclusions involves the inductive method of drawing conclusions and from the specific clause comes into the general rule. As for the conclusion of this study, it is a constitutional position because it is granted by our constitution in article 22 of the constitution of 1943 on the grounds that the birth of an ordinance of the constitution (perppu) is the priogical right of a President to determine a dangerous situation or to be in a desperate situation, But let's point out that in this ( Perppu) there are several chapters that are inconstitutional chapters 12, 27 and 28 (perppu) no. 01 year 2020, since that chapter runs counter to article I, 3 verse 1945 that says that Indonesia is the legal state (Perppu) does not have to be issued by a President, because at the time of this (Perppu), The house of representatives (DPR) also has not been in a state of abatement, so it is possible to maintain a normal regulatory regulation of law, not to mention state finances, but to be controlled by the house of representatives ( DPR ). Indeed, in principle (perppu) is the President's subjective right, but there is basically a form of legal deviation when (perppu) is intended to have another law revoked or ended. It may even be said that abuse of power is without a firm legal basis to support it.

Actions (login required)

View Item