Tinjauan Terhadap Kelalaian Suami Terhadap Hak Nafkah Anak Dalam Perceraian Berdasarka Putusan Nomor. 1665/Pdt.G/2016/Pa/Pbr. (Studi Kasus).

Riora, Robbil (2019) Tinjauan Terhadap Kelalaian Suami Terhadap Hak Nafkah Anak Dalam Perceraian Berdasarka Putusan Nomor. 1665/Pdt.G/2016/Pa/Pbr. (Studi Kasus). Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Preview

Text 141010272.pdf Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

In marital relations that give rise to the obligation of a husband to provide for his child and wife, in Islam it has been determined that a husband who becomes a father in addition to the obligation to provide for his wife he also has an obligation to provide for his children according to his limits. Livelihood is what is given by a husband to his wife and children, such as living quarters or the tranquility of his life so that his wife and children feel comfort or happiness. This study is intended to answer the problems that arise: How to consider the Panel of Judges of the Religious Court in Pekanbaru complete the Child Labor Rights Negligence lawsuit in Case No. 1665 / Pdt.G / 2016 D / PA / PBR? What are the legal consequences for parents who do not carry out their obligations in child rights after divorce? The purpose of this case is to carry out the obligations of a father after divorce to his children in the provision of child rights. This study belongs to the type of normative legal research by studying case decisions No: 1665 / Pdt.G / 2016 D / PA / PBR, and classified into descriptive nature. That is a study that provides as much data as possible about the negligence of a husband on the rights of livelihood of a child in divorce based on the decision No: 1665 / Pdt.G / 2016 D / PA / PBR, and consideration of the Pekanbaru Religious Court in deciding case No: 1665 / Pdt. G / 2016 D / PA / PBR, and compare the opinions of experts and applicable legislation. From the results of this research it can be concluded that, the plaintiff is the wife of a child named Yafied Wilyan Febriansyah who filed a lawsuit for negligence of the child's right of living starting from 21 months not providing a child. This is evident after the divorce never provided a child for 21 months, then the new court religion granted the plaintiff's claim based on the verdict No: 1665 / Pdt.G / 2016 D / PA / PBR, and gave the plaintiff the negligence of the child's rights, in Islamic law a father is obliged to provide for his children and divorce does not stop the obligation, while the provisions on the size of the right of child livelihood are not determined but the judge is given the authority to determine the number of child rights or maintenance costs for the child by paying attention to the father's ability to provide the child's right to live.

Actions (login required)

View Item