Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Tandatangan Surat Jalan (Putusan Perkara Pidana Nomor: 474/pid.b/2017/pn.dumai)

Ilham, Dede (2019) Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Tandatangan Surat Jalan (Putusan Perkara Pidana Nomor: 474/pid.b/2017/pn.dumai). Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 141010602.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (2MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

In criminal law, forgery of something is a form criminal offenses set out in the Criminal Code, the crime of forgery itself results in someone or another party get a loss so that this causes action falsifying something is regulated and included in a criminal act, based on the provisions contained in the Criminal Code the forgery consists of several one type of which is forgery of letters relating to someone's trust in the contents of the letter, forgery of the letter can happened to someone's signature contained in that letter is proof that the letter was made by someone who signed in the letter. The formulation of the problem in research is how the process proof of criminal acts of forgery of signature of road documents and considerations law of the judges of the Dumai District Court in deciding the case criminal Number: 474 / Pid.B / 2017 / PN.Dumai. This study uses normative legal methods in a way study criminal case files Number: 474 / Pid.B / 2017 / PN.Dumai, while the nature of this research is descriptive, namely drawing clearly and detailed about criminal acts of forgery of letters as they were done by the defendant so that there is a match or conflict between both. Based on the results of the study it can be seen that the process of proof criminal act of falsifying the signature of a road letter in Case Number : 474 / Pid.B / 2017 / PN.Dumai, seen from the legal facts in the trial evidenced by two evidences, namely the statement of witnesses who stated that knowing about the act of falsifying the document carried out by the defendant and evidence from the defendant who admitted that he had falsifying signatures and stamp stamps of Jefindo Dumai stores in letters delivery of goods, with two valid evidences submitted by the court then proof of the crime that was indicted against the defendant has been fulfill the principle of minimum proof. The consideration of the assembly law Dumai District Court judge in deciding criminal cases No: 474 / Pid.B / 2017 / PN.Dumai is the panel of judges of the Dumai District Court decided the defendant was legally declared and convincingly guilty of committing criminal act as charged by the Prosecutor with the consideration that the defendant's actions fulfilled all the elements of the crime charged by the Prosecutor, based on legal facts revealed in court through witness statements, statements of defendants and evidence submitted by the judge has confidence that the defendant has been guilty committing a criminal act as one who is charged and the judge does not have a reason for removing the criminal against the defendant because of this the defendant must account for his actions

Actions (login required)

View Item