Penerapan Pasal 170 KUHP Tentang Perusakan Barang Secara Bersama-sama Dalam Demo Mahasiwa Di Wilayah Hukum Kota Pekanbaru (Studi Kasus Perkara No. 135/PID. B/2021/PTPBR)

Sofhan, Dedi (2022) Penerapan Pasal 170 KUHP Tentang Perusakan Barang Secara Bersama-sama Dalam Demo Mahasiwa Di Wilayah Hukum Kota Pekanbaru (Studi Kasus Perkara No. 135/PID. B/2021/PTPBR). Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 181010665.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (3MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The existence of demonstrations carried out by students shows that our nation still has concern for the government that is happening at this time, a student demonstration occurred several years ago, precisely on October 08, 2020, there was a demonstration in front of the DPRD (Regional People's Representative Council) building. ) Riau Province, which involved students from the Islamic University of Riau (UIR), with demands to cancel the Omnibus Law Bill and the KPK Bill, which ended in clashes with the police. As for in this study, there are main problems to be discussed, namely, First: Application of Article 170 of the Criminal Code concerning Joint Destruction of Goods at a Student Demonstration in the Legal Area of ??Pekanbaru City (Case Study No. 135/PID.B/2021/PTPBR) and Second: Legal Considerations of Judges in Imposing Criminal Sanctions Against Perpetrators of Crime of Damage to Goods Conducted Together in Decision on Case No. 135/PID.B/2021/PTPBR. This legal research belongs to the type of survey research (Observational Research). This type of research method is intended to solve problems that exist at the present time by collecting data and compiling or clarifying it, then analyzing and seeing a legal reality in society to then obtain a result. The results of the research that the authors obtained are: The application of material criminal law in the Decision of Case No. 135/PID.B/2021/PTPBR. The application of Article 170 against the defendant Sahyuti Munthe based on the decisions of the Pekanbaru District Court and the Riau High Court was not appropriate for the defendant Sahyuti Munthe. Placement of Article 170 as an offense against Public Order, then it is interpreted as the main purpose of the act is to disturb public order. which based on the decision of the supreme court stated that the defendant was legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing a criminal act jointly destroying goods as regulated in Article 406 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, Jo. Article 55 paragraph (1) 1 of the Criminal Code is correct.

Actions (login required)

View Item