Tinjauan Yuridis Gugatan Ahli Waris Betuel Sitorus Terhadap Walikota Sibolga CG Dinas Kebersihan Pertamanan Tata Ruang Pemukiman (KPRP) Kota Sibolga. Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 230 K / PDT / 2017.

Yuda, Abraham Natama (2019) Tinjauan Yuridis Gugatan Ahli Waris Betuel Sitorus Terhadap Walikota Sibolga CG Dinas Kebersihan Pertamanan Tata Ruang Pemukiman (KPRP) Kota Sibolga. Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 230 K / PDT / 2017. Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Preview

Text 141010453.pdf - Submitted Version Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

In the ownership of land rights a certificate of ownership is a proof of ownership of the land which is regulated by law No.5 year 1960 concerning the basic rules of agrarian principles. Legally the land owner can secure it safely and avoid the land being sued by another party, but land disputes between the defendant and the plaintiff in the case 230 K / PDT / 2017. The main problem in this study is based on the Supreme Court Decision Number 230 K / PDT / 2017. The problem that the writer formulated is related to: How Legal Considerations of the Supreme Court Judges in deciding civil law cases 230 K / PDT / 2017 and What are the strengths of evidence in deciding case Number 230 K / PDT / 2017 In order to answer the problems that have been formulated, the method that the author uses in this study is seen from its type, including the type of normative research by studying the case study of decision No. 230 K / PDT / 2017 and applicable regulations related to the main problem. Judging from its nature, this research is descriptive in nature to provide a clear and detailed description of the subject matter examined. The results of case study No. 230 K / PDT / 2017 is granting application for cassation from applicant Bonar L Sitorus. Then cancel the decision of the Medan High Court Number. 160 / PDT / 2016 / PT.MDN, dated 12 July 2016 which affirmed the Sibolga District Court's Decision Number. 1 / PDT.G / 2015 / PN. SBG, January 21, 2016. That because of the claim of the cassation / plaintiff / appellant / appellant is not acceptable, the plaintiff is sentenced to pay the court fee at all court levels. In this case, the writer considers that the Judge should have appealed to the defendant Paimatua lubis to explain whether the process of the Waiver of the Right to Compensation or the transfer of land ownership certificate was correct and had been carried out. Authentic deed is very important in this case to strengthen the judge's decision and to find out who owns the land.

Actions (login required)

View Item