Kekuatan Visum ET Repertum Dalam Putusan Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Hukum Pada Pelaku Tindak Pidana Yang Mengidap Waham Paranoid (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 1207/PID.B/2020/PNPBR)

Mulia, Nurjanna (2022) Kekuatan Visum ET Repertum Dalam Putusan Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Hukum Pada Pelaku Tindak Pidana Yang Mengidap Waham Paranoid (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 1207/PID.B/2020/PNPBR). Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 171010420.pdf - Submitted Version Download (3MB)

Abstract

In this increasingly modern era, it makes someone more daring to commit a crime, therefore there is a significant increase in the number of criminal cases. Because Indonesia adheres to the Continental European system using the judge's conviction to assess evidence with his own conviction, the criminal act in its resolution aims to find the material truth of a case being examined. In carrying out evidence, the judge must focus on the interests of the defendant in which he must be treated fairly, in accordance with the facts and available evidence to be found guilty or not. And also the interests of the community which aims to create a deterrent effect among the community by looking at the sanctions that have been given to the defendant if proven guilty. There are two main problems that the researcher raised from this research, namely first, how is the strength of the proof of Visum et Repertum in a criminal act in which the perpetrator has paranoid delusions in case Number 1207/Pid.B/2020/PNpbr and second, how are the legal considerations of the judge against the perpetrator? a crime that suffers from delusions of paranoud based on Visum et Repertum in case Number 1207/Pid.B/2020/PNpbr. The research used is normative-empirical research, which is a type of combined research between normative and empirical research by conducting interviews with several related parties such as psychiatrists as experts in this case, the public prosecutor in this case, and the presiding judge in this case. It can be understood that in case number: 1207/Pid.B/2020/PNpbr Visum et repertum in evidence has strong enough power, because in this case the judge was greatly helped by the existence of Vsium et Repertum Psychiatry which stated that the perpetrator was Imran Als Imran Bin Abdul Rahman has a severe mental disorder, so he cannot be held responsible for this case

Actions (login required)

View Item