Analisis Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Speed Hump Di Pekanbaru (Studi Kecamatan Bukit Raya Kota Pekanbaru)

Pratama, Aidil Tri (2020) Analisis Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Speed Hump Di Pekanbaru (Studi Kecamatan Bukit Raya Kota Pekanbaru). Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 167110861.pdf - Submitted Version Download (1MB)

Abstract

This study examines in depth the Analysis of the Implementation of Speed Hump Development in Pekanbaru City (Study of the Bukit Raya Pekanbaru City). The purpose of this research is to find out and analyze the implementation of Speed Hump Development in Pekanbaru City (Study in the Bukit Raya District of Pekanbaru City). The research method used in this research is the quantitative method approach which aims to find data and information about the description of a phenomenon, facts, properties, and relationships of certain phenomena comprehensively and integrally. The indicators in this study are Input, Process, Output. The population in this study consisted of 73 people while the sample consisted of 20 people. The technique used in this study is for the Pekanbaru City Transportation Department Employees, the writer uses saturated sampling techniques and for RW and community leaders in the Bukit Raya sub-district of Pekanbaru, the city uses simple random sampling technique. Types and data collection techniques used consist of primary data, obtained directly from respondents using questionnaire and interview list techniques and secondary data collected using observation techniques. While the data analysis technique used is descriptive method. Based on this analysis technique, the researcher concludes that the analysis of the implementation of the Speed Hump development of Pekanbaru City (Study in the Bukit Raya Pekanbaru City) is at an adequate assessment interval with a total score of 238 out of 20 respondents. The conclusion of this research is that in the Implementation of the Speed Hump Development of Pekanbaru City (Study in the Bukit Raya Pekanbaru City) it is still not effective, because there are still several indicators that have not been fully implemented in the field.

Actions (login required)

View Item