Ramadhan, Taufhan (2019) Analisis Yuridis Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak Pada Tahap Penuntutan Di Kejaksaan Negeri Pekanbaru (Studi Penetapan Nomor : 04/PID.SUS-Anak/2016/PN.PBR). Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.
Text
151010133.pdf - Submitted Version Download (4MB) |
Abstract
Children are young people who still need attention, and guidance from parents or people around them. Therefore it is unfortunate if this young person is ensnared by a legal case which is considered to still be the threshold of juvenile delinquency must deal with the law and especially criminal law where later the law can destroy the future of the child because the legal channels, especially criminal law is a way finally in the settlement of a case or known as Ultimum Remidium which means misery. So Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System makes new breakthroughs so that this does not happen by giving birth to a legal method called Diversi. Diversity is a method of transferring formal legal channels against children through deliberations. The main problem in this study is how the settlement of embezzlement offenses committed by children through Diversion by the Public Prosecutor in the Pekanbaru District Attorney and what are the obstacles and obstacles in the settlement of embezzlement offenses committed by children cannot be resolved by the public prosecutor through the method diversion in the state attorney general Pekanbaru. This type of research in this research is Observational Research by means of a survey using interviews, this research was conducted by selecting a location in the Pekanbaru District Attorney. While judging from the nature of this research is descriptive in nature that is research that provides a detailed and detailed picture of the Juridical Analysis of the Settlement of Illicit Crimes committed by Children during the Prosecution stage in Pekanbaru District Attorney. Settlement diversion is a form of new methods that have legal benefits for children, especially for the future and development of children. Diversion Settlement carried out by the Pekanbaru District Attorney's Office has fulfilled the requirements and applicable elements in accordance with Law No. 11 of 2012 although there are several elements that have not been fulfilled due to the lack of socialization in the implementation. Such as the lack of a Special Public Prosecutor for Children and the unavailability of a Special Children Room in the Pekanbaru District Attorney. In implementing the Diversi effort, it is still very and often encountered obstacles and obstacles that can result in the failure of a Diversi effort that is very beneficial, especially in terms of legal usefulness. Based on research the failure of a diversion effort is caused by the nature of the child's family who are still concerned with the nature of the ego, especially on the victim's side. Making it difficult for the Facilitator to produce an understanding that makes the Diversi effort successful.
Item Type: | Thesis (Other) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Children, Diversion, Prosecutors' Office, Public Prosecutors | |||||||||
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) K Law > K Law (General) |
|||||||||
Divisions: | > Ilmu Hukum | |||||||||
Depositing User: | Mohamad Habib Junaidi | |||||||||
Date Deposited: | 04 Apr 2022 07:57 | |||||||||
Last Modified: | 04 Apr 2022 07:57 | |||||||||
URI: | http://repository.uir.ac.id/id/eprint/9860 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |