Handayani, Asita Mugi
(2020)
Penyelesaian Sengketa Advokat dan Klien Berdasarkan Kesepakatan Bersama Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa (Studi Kesepakatan Advokat Tonny Dengan Wagina Selaku Klien Di Kab. Sidoarjo).
Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.
Abstract
An agreement is one of the valid conditions of an agreement that then gives rise to an alliance in which it gives rise to rights and obligations on both sides of an agreement, in which one party has the right to request something to the other party, then the other party is required to meet the demands. The problem between Advocate Tonny and his Client Wagina is that the performance of the defendant's right to take his share has been agreed with the Plaintiff as the defendant's attorney in the Joint Agreement Statement in the Distribution of Proceeds. In this study, the authors raised two formulations of the problem, namely How to Default on Dispute Resolution advocate Tonny and Client Based on Mutual Agreement in Dispute Resolution (Study of Tonny Advocate Agreement with Wagina As Client In Sidoarjo District) and How to Hold Parties Accountable For Dispute Resolution of Tonny Advocates and Clients Based on Mutual Agreement in Dispute Resolution (Study of Tonny Advocate Agreement with Wagina As Client In Kab. Sidoarjo). The research method used in this study is Normative, which is to review the verdict in the case number: 126/Pdt.G/2016/PN. letter of mutual agreement in the distribution of results. In this study, the method of drawing conclusions used is the Deductive method, which is the withdrawal of conclusions from general things leading to specific things. The result of research and discussion that in this study, the decision of the judge of sidoarjo District Court in deciding the Court's Decision, is that the actions that have been taken by the Defendant are clearly unlawful accompanied by valid evidence and binding deed under the stampede of the Joint Agreement in the Distribution of Proceeds is an act of non-agreement or default, while wagina defendant's liability does not want to take its share of Rp.100.000.000,- (one hundred million rupiah) stemming from the settlement of the dispute on his land ownership which has been settled by his attorney Tonny as Plaintiff, then he instead asks all parts then revoke the power unilaterally while the achievement has been done properly (completed). As a result of the legal process of resolving the dispute, Tonny's actions in granting Defendant a warning letter and the decision of the Sidoarjo District Court are appropriate because the defendant's actions have clearly violated the law which means That Wagina Defendant as a client of Advocate Tonny must receive his share of Rp.100.000.000,- (one hundred million rupiah).
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
