Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Kekerasan Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak (studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 05/PID.Susanak/2016/PN.PBR)

Nst, Nurdin Candra Sakti. (2019) Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Kekerasan Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak (studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 05/PID.Susanak/2016/PN.PBR). Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Preview

Text 121010217.pdf - Submitted Version Download (918kB) | Preview

Abstract

Crime of theft by violence committed by children is often happen. Such conditions raise concerns for the community, so it is necessary immediately addressed, both by all law enforcement officials, especially the police and all levels of society. One case of theft with weights carried out by underage children (17 years) that is done by Aldi Saputra Als Aldi Bin Arisman Saputra. The crime scene on Jl. Parit Indah Tangkerang Labuai Village. Bukit District Raya Pekanbaru on Monday 26 October 2015 around 93.00 WIB, inside Bulit Raya District Police jurisdiction. The main problem is the application of the law to perpetrators of criminal offenses with violence committed by children in Decision Number: 05 / Pid.Sus-Anak / 2016 / PN.Pbr and what is the legal consideration of judges in imposing criminal theft with violence committed by children in Decision Number: 05 / Pid.Sus-Anak / 2016 / PN.Pbr. The research method used in this study is normative or library. While the nature of this research is descriptive, meaning that the author tries to give an overview in detail about the application of the law against perpetrators of criminal acts of theft with violence committed by children in Decision Number: 05 / Pid.Sus-Anak / 2016 / PN.Pbr and legal consideration of judges in imposing criminal theft with violence carried out by children in Decision Number: 05 / Pid.Sus-Anak / 2016 / PN.Pbr. From the results of the research that the authors did it was known that the application of the law to Crime Theft with violence in Decision Number: 05 / Pid.Sus- Anak / 2016 / PN.Pbr, by the Public Prosecutor used a single indictment namely Article 365 paragraph (2) 1st and 2nd Criminal Code and in accordance with the applicable criminal provisions and the conditions can be charged by the defendant, this is based on examination and facts revealed at the hearing, where the evidence presented by the Public Prosecutor is statement of witnesses and evidence in accordance with the statement of the defendant who acknowledged the deed he had done. So that the panel of Judges declared the defendant's actions has fulfilled the elements of the criminal act charged by the Public Prosecutor, namely namely Article 365 paragraph (2) 1st and 2nd of the Criminal Code. Legal considerations of judges in imposing criminal offenses with violence done by the child in Decision Number: 05 / Pid.Sus-Anak / 2016 / PN.Pbr is right. The judge in this case gave a lighter verdict than the Prosecutor's claim Public Prosecutor. This decision can make improvements in this case for self-improvement the defendants are classified as Children (Between 12 Years and 18 Years).

Actions (login required)

View Item