Azaria, Annora Liza (2025) Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Money Laundering Dalam Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Perbankan Pada Perkara Nomor 1152/Pid.Sus/2022/Pn Plg. Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text skripsi_211010161_watermark.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (2MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This study examines how judges prove and consider money laundering offenses in cases of banking embezzlement. Banking crimes, often referred to as banking fraud, include practices such as document forgery, transaction manipulation, abuse of authority, and cyberattacks, committed by both internal actors within banking institutions and external parties. Such crimes threaten the integrity of the financial system, making strict preventive measures necessary to safeguard public trust and ensure financial stability. The main issues of this research are to understand the legal reasoning of judges in delivering verdicts, to analyze the application of evidence in court proceedings, and to provide academic contributions for strengthening criminal law enforcement in the increasingly complex field of financial crimes in Indonesia. The research method employed is a normative juridical approach with a descriptive analytical character. Data were obtained through literature study and analysis of legal documents, including primary legal sources such as statutes and court decisions, secondary sources such as books and academic journals, and tertiary sources such as legal dictionaries. The analysis was conducted descriptively and analytically, using deductive reasoning, in order to produce conclusions that are logical, systematic, and academically accountable. The findings indicate that judges proved banking embezzlement and money laundering cumulatively by linking predicate crimes with subsequent offenses. In the case examined, the court imposed a sentence of three years imprisonment and a fine of five billion rupiah. The study argues that the application of concursus realis, namely the imposition of two separate penalties, would have ensured a more proportional sentence and a stronger deterrent effect. The study concludes that the proof of both crimes is interrelated and requires the application of a combined theoretical approach to achieve substantive justice. Recommendations highlight the need to strengthen banking supervision, enhance the capacity of law enforcement authorities, and optimize the application of the follow the money principle to prevent the recurrence of similar crimes in the future..

Actions (login required)

View Item