Satria, Zevin Febrianda (2025) Pembuktian Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Anak Di Bawah Umur Di Pengadilan Rokan Hilir Berdasarkan Studi Kasus Nomor 102/Pid.Sus/2024/Pn RHL. Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text skripsi_181010560_watermark.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (4MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

he crime of sexual abuse currently often befalls children who are still minors, this is very concerning because children are very valuable assets that Allah SWT has entrusted to us, so it is only right that we protect and love them, because every child has dignity, dignity, and equally has human rights (HAM). Children as one of the hopes for parents who can later be useful for the family, society and also the country where children as the next generation who must receive direction and guidance about their obligations, always receive protection for their rights as children. Protection and guidance for children is the responsibility of parents, family, society and the state The formulation of the problem in this study is How is the Proof Process for the Criminal Act of Child Molestation in the Rokan Hilir Court Based on Case Study Number 102 / Pid.Sus / 2024 / PN Rhl and How are the Legal Considerations of the Panel of Judges in Deciding the Verdict in Case Study Number 102 / Pid.Sus / 2024 / PN Rhl Not Based on Article 289 of the Criminal Code The type and nature of this research method is Normative Research, descriptive in nature, namely describing the proof of the criminal act of child molestation in the Rokan Hilir Court Based on Case Study Number 102 / Pid.Sus / 2024 / Pn Rhl. Data and data sources consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Case decision Number: 102/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Rhl, the witness's statement from the Child Victim did not meet the formal requirements as stipulated in Article 160 paragraph (3) of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) that witnesses are required to take an oath or promise every time they are asked for information in court according to their respective religions. In the decision of case Number 102/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Rhl, it describes the beginning of the case carried out by the Defendant Eki Putra alias Hengki Bin Yunizar, around 2015 to 2018 or at least at another time which was still included in 2015 to 2018 at the Defendant's House in Suka Sari Hamlet RT.011 / RW.004, Panca Mukti Village, Bagan Sinembah Raya District, Rokan Hilir Regency, committing a criminal act of molestation against a minor. Basically, all acts of sexual abuse occur not only because of the victim.

Actions (login required)

View Item