Salma, Putri (2025) Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pendahan Kelapa Sawit Di Pengadilan Negeri Pelalawan Studi Kasus Perkara Nomor 20/Pid.B/2024/PN.PLW). Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text skripsi_201010049_watermark.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (3MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The palm oil industry is the largest source of non-oil and gas foreign exchange for Indonesia. However, crimes of enriching oneself often occur, one of which is the crime of detention. As happened in decision No.20/Pid.B/2024/PN. PLW. This is detrimental to the company that manages the industry and has the potential to disrupt the management company's processes and disturb the public. The perpetrator's actions violated Article 480 1 of the Criminal Code. The formulation of the problem in this research is the process of proving the criminal act of holding palm fruit in the Pelalawan District Court based on case study No. 20/PID.B/2024/PN-PLW and how the panel of judges considers when deciding the case of the criminal act of holding palm fruit in the district court. Pelalawan Based on Case Study No. 20/PID.B/2024/PN-PLW. The legal research method that the author used in the research carried out was the Normative Juridical legal research method, also called doctrinal legal research. In normative research secondary data as a source/material of information can be primary legal material, secondary legal material and tertiary legal material. Namely, providing an overview of the problems found to be interrelated in a relevant and logical and legal manner to find out the description and clarity and detail of Case No. 20/PID.B/2024/PN-PLW. The results of this research show that the decision of the panel of judges regarding the criminal act of detention at the Pelalawan District Court was that in the trial the Public Prosecutor presented legal facts in the form of witnesses, evidence, the defendant's statement, and evidence in the trial so that the defendant's statement could be identified. and these facts are in sync with each other. Judges have an obligation to find the law and determine the law regarding a case to be resolved. Therefore, the Panel of Judges is confident that the defendant Dedi Cristy Anak Dari Merdiaman Damanik is proven guilty of committing the crime of detention as regulated in Article 480 1 of the Criminal Code. The legal consequence of the Panel of Judges' decision regarding the criminal act of detention is that a crime has been imposed and the defendant has admitted his actions and promised not to repeat his actions.

Actions (login required)

View Item