Kurniawan, Luthfi (2025) Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika Di Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru (Putusan Nomor : 195/Pid.Sus/2023/Pn.Pbr). Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.
|
Text
skripsi_211010186_watermark.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (3MB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
Narcotics abuse is a very complex problem that requires a thorough and sustained effort to solve it by involving all aspects of society and law enforcement. This narcotics abuse has become widespread, as can be seen from the increasing number of narcotics users, both among teenagers, adults, state government, and even police or law enforcement. And likewise with the problem of criminal law enforcement contained in the related decision contained by the author in the evidence in the case of narcotics crimes at the Pekanbaru District Court (decision number: 195/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Pbr). This is that it has been proven to have violated the criminal act of narcotics of the type methamphetamine or sabu-sabu regulated in Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. As for this study, there is a main problem that will be discussed, namely, first, how to prove in the case of Narcotics Crimes at the Pekanbaru District Court (Decision Number: 195/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Pbr). and the second is how the legal considerations of the panel of judges in deciding the case of narcotics crimes at the Pekanbaru District Court (Decision Number: 195/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Pbr). And the purpose of this research is the same as the formulation of the main problem, namely to find out the results of the problem formulation made by the researcher. This legal research is a type of Normative Juridical research or referred to as library research. This type of research method is intended to provide legal arguments as a basis for determining whether an event is right or wrong, as well as how the event should be according to the law. The results of the research obtained by the author are that it is important from an evidence and/or evidence submitted at the trial by the public prosecutor in proving a narcotics crime to convince the panel of judges to sentence its verdict, as well as the judge's consideration in deciding the case, namely looking at the public prosecutor's indictment, witness statements, expert statements, letters, instructions, and the defendant's testimony that conclusions are drawn to sentence the sentence.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Other) |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | Contribution Contributors NIDN/NIDK Thesis advisor Rahmad, Riadi Asra 1017026702 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | evidence, narcotics crimes, Pekanbaru district court. |
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | > Ilmu Hukum |
| Depositing User: | Mia Darmiah |
| Date Deposited: | 09 Dec 2025 03:52 |
| Last Modified: | 09 Dec 2025 03:52 |
| URI: | https://repository.uir.ac.id/id/eprint/32190 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
