Gani, Zul Fadli (2023) Analisis Normatif Tindak Pidana Penipuan Dan Penggelapan Investasi Bodong Oleh Dirut Pt. Stm Dalam Perkara Nomor: 87/pid.b/2021/pn Pbr. Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 161010139.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Fraud and embezzlement are an offense and are classified an act of crime that can harm the other party because of that law enforcement needs to be implemented in the form of legal sanctions against violations what society does, in fact criminal law is suffering and sorrow for those who are affected by it, therefore criminal law becomes commander in chief legal settlements that occur in society, criminal acts of embezzlement and fraud committed by the leadership of an institution is a violation and is an unlawful act in the context of Indonesian criminal law, Most recently there was a criminal act committed by the director of the STM company resulting in losses so that the analysis of the decisions issued by court, the fraud caused a loss rather than which party carry out fraudulent investments that harm the parties and society. The main problem in this research is how the process of proof Criminal Law Against Fraudulent Investment Fraud and Embezzlement Cases by president of PT. STM in case no. 87/PID.B/2021/PN PBR, and how legal considerations of the panel of judges on cases of fraud and embezzlement bulging investment by the president director of PT. STM in case no. 87/PID.B/2021/PN PBR. When viewed from the type of research, the authors use research Noormative Law, namely direct research conducted on the Library and Constitution. The nature of this research is descriptive analysis, which aims describe and explain systematically a phenomenon that exists in public. This approach is an approach to learn, explain or interpreting a problem in context. Process of Proving Criminal Law Against Fraud and Embezzlement Cases Fraudulent Investment by the President Director of PT. STM In Case Number. 87/PID.B/2021/PN PBR, it is very appropriate according to the legal provisions in the Criminal Procedure Code, where in Article 184 KUHAP paragraph (1), explains that evidence must be through means of evidence: Information witness, Expert Statement, Statement of Letter, Instructions and Statement of the Defendant. In the Legal Considerations of the Panel of Judges Against Fraud Cases and Fraudulent Investment Embezzlement by the President Director of PT. STM In Case Number. 87/PID.B/2021/PN PBR, referring to evidence in the trial and facts all the stages passed in the trial process, so that the Assembly The judge issues his considerations, determines and decides.

Actions (login required)

View Item