Hulu, Susanti Putri Mawati (2023) Pelaksanaan Diversi Dalam Kasus Pencurian Dengan Pemberatan Di Pengadilan Negeri Rokan Hulu (studi Kasus). Other thesis, Fakultas Hukum.

Text 191010195.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System which seeks to create a legal system that truly guarantees the best protection for children who are in conflict with the law, keeps children away from the judicial process and these children are expected to return to the social environment in a reasonable manner. The main problem in this research is how to carry out diversion in cases of weighted theft at the Rokan Hulu District Court in case Number: 27/Pen.Div/2022/PNPrg and what are the obstacles in the diversion process at the Rokan Hulu District Court in case Number : 27/Pen.Div/2022/PNPrg. The research method used in this research is a survey, while the nature of this research is descriptive. The population in this study amounted to 1 (one) child judge with accidental sampling technique and the data collection tool used was interviews. From the results of the research conducted by the author, it is known that the implementation of diversion in cases of weighted theft at the Rokan Hulu District Court in case Number: 16/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PNPrg, was carried out by the Child Judge who was determined by the Chief Justice after receiving the delegation report cases from the prosecution level. After the Juvenile Judge has been appointed, the Juvenile Judge will then examine the case so that he decides to do a diversion and succeeds in reaching an agreement and putting it into a stipulation from the Rokan Hulu District Court. Obstacles in the diversion process at the Rokan Hulu District Court in case Number: 27/Pen.Div/2022/PNPrg, namely: a). Lack of public understanding of the implementation of diversion, with the assumption that the Juvenile Judge defended the offender's child not to be processed. b). The lack of the role of Correctional Centers, so that Juvenile Judges do not get background information on the offender's child. c). The demand for compensation from the victim is too high, so that the child of the perpetrator is unable to pay it.

Actions (login required)

View Item