Yanti, Dwi Riski (2023) Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Melalui Pasal 6 Undang-undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 Tentang Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah Berikut Benda-benda yang Berkaitan dengan Tanah di Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang (KPKNL) Kota Pekanbaru. Masters thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 211021090.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (2MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The implementation of the execution of the mortgage on the land and the objects above is a problem that is serious enough to become an obstacle for the KPKNL Pekanbaru in conducting the auction/execution of the dependent object. Based on the facts on the ground at the Pekanbaru KPKNL, there are problems where the debtor disputes the land that has been executed. The debtor who did not accept it, filed a lawsuit with the Pekanbaru City District Court so that until now it is still in the trial process. In this case, of course the creditor gets a loss where the object of the mortgage is not sold because anyone is not interested in buying the auctioned object that is in trouble. So of course this case causes the debtor's money to sink just like that. The main problems in this study are: How is the implementation of the execution of Dependent Rights through Article 6 of Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Dependent Rights on land and objects related to land at the State Wealth and Auction Service Office (KPKNL) of Pekanbaru city and What are the obstacles in the implementation of the execution of Dependent Rights through Article 6 of Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Dependent Rights on land and objects related to land at the State Wealth and Auction Service Office (KPKNL) of Pekanbaru city. The method used to answer the problems mentioned above is the sociological law research method. Meanwhile, in terms of its nature, this research is descriptive-analytical. The data was obtained through direct interviews with the First Expert Auctioneer at the Pekanbaru State Assets and Auction Services Office (KPKNL) and Debtors whose Mortgage Rights were Executed as well as the Field Collection executor section at Bank Mandiri Sudirman Bawah Pekanbaru. The results of the study show that the implementation of the mortgage execution auction was not carried out properly because there were problems where the object of mortgage rights became the object of dispute and was in the process of trial at the Pekanbaru District Court. The execution of the mortgage object with problems cannot be auctioned off by the KPKNL, so in this case the execution of the mortgage auction is hampered. The inhibiting factors for the implementation of the auction consist of 2 parts, namely the inhibiting factors before the implementation of the auction and the inhibiting factors after the implementation of the auction.

Actions (login required)

View Item