Ardi, Rinto (2025) Tanggung Jawab Pengelola Parkir Terhadap Kehilangan Barang Di Parkiran Family Box Kota Pekanbaru Berdasarkan Putusan Ma Nomor 2078/k/pdt/2009. Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.
![]() |
Text
211010391.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (5MB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
Parking is a transportation need where the vehicle stops temporarily or for a long time, then the driver leaves the vehicle because every trip by vehicle always starts and ends in a parking lot we see many parking spaces, such as on the side of the road, in buildings or shopping centers, and in the field area provided. The parking relationship that arises between parking users and managers is in the form of a storage agreement. The responsibility of parking managers for lost goods in the Family Box parking area of Pekanbaru City, the author formulates two main problems, namely first how is the responsibility of parking managers for lost goods in the Family Box parking area of Pekanbaru City, second what are the Inhibiting Factors in the responsibility of parking managers for lost goods in the parking area outside the Family Box in Pekanbaru City. This study aims to determine the responsibility of parking managers for lost goods in the Family Box parking area of Pekanbaru City. And find out the obstacles in the responsibility of parking managers for lost goods in the Family Box parking area of Pekanbaru City. The research method used is Empirical research, with the population in this study being the Head of the Pekanbaru City Transportation Agency, parking managers and parking service users who lost goods in the Family Box Parking area of Pekanbaru City. The results of the study concluded that the responsibility of the parking manager if a vehicle is lost in the Family Box parking area of Pekanbaru City is; the parking manager only helps find and provide information to the authorities, only replaces helmets that are lost due to their own negligence and does not provide a replacement vehicle because it refers to the standard clause on the parking levy ticket. So far, this has not been implemented so that many motorized vehicles in public parking lots are lost. In fact, this is the responsibility of the parking manager, especially since the parking manager asks for a levy as a parking service. For motorized vehicles that are not there, especially in public parking lots, consumer protection has not been implemented, and researchers found different facts that the parking ticket in the family box does not include a standard clause as stated by the parking manager, but the parking manager does not want to be responsible, this is contrary to the Supreme Court decision No. 2078 / K / Pdt / 2009 which states that the parking manager is responsible and compensates for losses for lost goods experienced by consumers. And there are several factors that hinder the responsibility of parking managers for lost items, namely the existence of standard clauses listed on parking tickets, factors not understanding parking regulations, and economic factors.
Item Type: | Thesis (Other) |
---|---|
Contributors: | Contribution Contributors NIDN/NIDK Sponsor Santri, Selvi Harvia 1030048404 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | parking manager responsibility, Lost goods |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) K Law > K Law (General) |
Divisions: | > Ilmu Hukum |
Depositing User: | Erza Pebriani S.Pd |
Date Deposited: | 12 Sep 2025 09:23 |
Last Modified: | 12 Sep 2025 09:23 |
URI: | https://repository.uir.ac.id/id/eprint/28999 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |