Fhatia, Yasmin Aisah (2025) Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Kesusilaan Dengan Menggunakan Dokumen Elektronik (studi Kasus). Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 211010334.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (5MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Developments in the field of information and communication technology have led to the birth of various new legal actions or acts. Revenge porn is a crime that falls into the cyber crime group. The case with Number 1253/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Pbr is one of the revenge porn cases that occurred within the jurisdiction of the Pekanbaru District Court. The formulation of the problem in this study consists of two points. First, how to prove in case Number 1253/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Pbr. Second, how are the legal considerations of the Panel of Judges of the Pekanbaru District Court in Case Number 1253/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Pbr. The research method used in this study is the normative method. Data is collected by examining documents and/or articles in print or digital form. In this study, the source of data is the decision of Case Number 1253/Pid.Sus/2023/Pn Pbr. As well as legal documents, books, journals, official documents or other scientific works related to the discussion of this research. From the results of this research, it was found that the defendant was proven to have committed the crime of revenge porn against the victim. Proven by all evidence, namely experts, witnesses and real evidence, the defendant was proven to have violated Article 45 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 27 paragraph (1) of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2016 concerning amendments to Law number 11 of 2008 regarding Information and Electronic Transactions. Where the indictment is based on the considerations of the Panel of Judges which consider that all the elements contained in the ITE Law have been fulfilled, considering that the defendant's plea is no longer relevant, considering that the judge did not find anything that could eliminate criminal liability, considering that there are the facts of which have been reviewed by the panel of judges and weighed based on the aggravating and mitigating circumstances of the defendant, the defendant M. PANJI ADINUL HAKIM Alias PANJI is guilty of committing a criminal act, intentionally and without the right to transmit an electronic document containing a content that violates decency. Based on the considerations of the Panel of Judges, the defendant received sanctions in the form of imprisonment for 2 (two) years and 6 (six) months and a fine of Rp. .1.000.000.000,- with the order that the defendant remain in custody.

Actions (login required)

View Item