Putri, Indah Azhari (2025) Tinjauan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Permufakatan Jahat Memproduksi Narkotika Golongan I (studi Putusan Nomor 726/pid.sus/2022/pn.btm). Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 211010237.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This research is about a review of the crime of malicious conspiracy to produce class 1 narcotics based on the study of decision number 726/Pid.Sus/PN. BTM which is one of the narcotics crime cases that occurred in Batam City, Riau Islands Province which attracted public attention. In decision number 726/Pid.Sus/PN. The defendant was tried separately from the other two defendants, one of whom was a foreign national. The formulation of the problem in this study is in the form of how the process of proving against the crime of malicious conspiracy to produce class I narcotics (study of decision 726/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Btm) and how the panel of judges considers the law in the case of criminal conspiracy of class I narcotics (study of decision 726/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Btm). The research method used in this study is in the form of normative or literature research methods equipped with secondary data. First, primary legal materials in the form of the Criminal Code, Criminal Code, Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics and criminal files of decision number 726/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Btm. Second, secondary legal materials in the form of research, thesis, recognized journals, and books. Third, tertiary legal materials in the form of Language dictionaries or legal dictionaries that aim to explain primary and secondary legal materials. The results of the research and discussion contained in this study are two things, namely the first is that the proof process is in accordance with the applicable law which is based on the fulfillment of evidence in the form of testimony of six witnesses from the Public Prosecutor and one verbal witness. Then there is a letter of laboratory examination results and the results of the minutes of the weighing of evidence, as well as clues and evidence. Based on the discovery of the evidence, it will form the judge's confidence in the legal considerations of the panel of judges to decide the case that the defendant must be held accountable for his actions.

Actions (login required)

View Item