Amri, Rici Verdiansyah (2023) Analisis Yuridis Putusan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pengadilan Negeri Makassar Nomor : 77/pid.sus- Tpk/2022/pn Mks. Masters thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 191022127.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (3MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The effort to enforce the law on corruption by Indonesia is to form a corruption court, hereinafter referred to as the Corruption Court based on Law Number 46 of 2009, concerning the Corruption Crime Court, which is a special court and the only court authorized to examine corruption cases. , adjudicate, and decide cases of corruption. The formulation of the problem in this study is the Evidence of the Corruption Crime Decision at the Makassar District Court Number 77/Pid.Sus- TPK/2022/PN Mks and the legal considerations of the panel of judges in deciding the Corruption Crime case at the Makassar District Court Number 77/Pid.Sus - TPK/2022/PN Mks. Judging from the type of this research is normative legal research. While seen from its nature, this writing is descriptive in the sense of providing an overview accompanied by a systematic explanation. The process of proving the Corruption Crime at the Makassar District Court Number 77/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PN Mks where the Defendant was charged with charges in the form of subsidiarity namely Article 2 Paragraph (1) of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Acts Corruption Crime as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes Jo. Article 64 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code Subs. Article 3 Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes as amended by Law number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes Jo. Article 64 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. Whereas based on the evidentiary process it is in accordance with the provisions of the evidence in Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code which has been presented by the public prosecutor starting with witness statements, expert statements, letters, defendant statements, and instructions and evidence have been appropriate and correct. The panel of judges passed a verdict in the form of a crime against the defendant and had previously considered all the facts that had been revealed at trial including regarding the evidence that had been carried out by the public prosecutor by presenting witnesses, submitting expert evidence, submitting documentary evidence and submitting evidence. the defendant as well as showing evidence at the trial so that the panel of judges makes judgments in imposing a criminal decision by considering the aggravating and mitigating factors.

Actions (login required)

View Item