Rafiq, Irfhan (2025) Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Penipuan Dengan Modus Penggunaan Identitas Palsu (studi Kasus No.773/pid.b/2020/pn Pbr). Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 191010577.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The process of providing reliable evidence to support the veracity of an argument in a lawsuit is known as proof. Giving the judge assurance regarding the veracity of the contested event is the aim. Finding the material truth—that is, the actual truth—is the goal of proof in criminal prosecutions. Proof in criminal cases starts with the investigative phase. Negative law, which requires at least two reliable pieces of evidence, is the foundation of the proof system. An act that contravenes the law and has criminal penalties is called a crime. A crime is also known as a criminal occurrence, criminal conduct, or crime in the legal context. Article 378 of the Criminal Code (KUHP) regulates fraud. Fraud is defined as an act that. The main questions in the research are how the process of developing a case of tindak pidana penipuan using palsu identification is carried out in the study kasus No.773/Pid.B/2020/PN Pbr and how the application of hukum majelis hakim to the case of tindak pidana penipuan using palsu identification is carried out. In the study kasus No.773/Pid.B/2020/PN Pbr. perkara nomor. The kind of legal research that is employed falls under the category of normative legal research methodologies; specifically, normative legal research is conceived as a rule or norm that serves as a standard for acceptable human conduct. In accordance with the Public Prosecutor's Single Indictment, TANIA ANNA MIRANA ALS NIA BINTI ZULKARNAEN, the defendant, has been found legally and conclusively guilty of committing the crime of "Fraud"; Consequently, the defendant is being sentenced to one (1) year and two (2) months in jail; calculating the length of the defendant's arrest and incarceration, which will be fully subtracted from the sentence; deciding to keep the defendant in custody; One black jacket, brand DESLIGES; one pair of black shoes; one BCA ATM card, number 5379 4130 2528 1483; confiscated to be burned; One (one) transfer receipt for Rp 400,000,- (four hundred thousand rupiah) from BRI Bank on May 30, 2020; one (one) transfer receipt for Rp 1,500,000,- (one million five hundred thousand rupiah) from BCA Bank on May 29, 2020; one (one) transfer receipt for Rp 1,000,000,- (one million rupiah) from BCA Bank on June 1, 2020; returned to witness MAFTUHUR ROZAQ, also known as OJAK; the defendant is required to pay Rp 3,000.00 (three thousand rupiah) in court fees; Aggravating circumstances: The community has been upset by the defendant's behavior. The money earned from his crime has been appreciated by the defendant; Mitigating circumstances: the defendant's courteous and forthright admission of guilt; taking into account that he must pay court costs as a result of receiving a criminal sentence

Actions (login required)

View Item