Ningsih, Lisna Aprilia (2025) Analisis Keekonomian Pekerjaan Reperforated Pada Sumur La#1 Lapangan Pt.spr Langgak. Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.
![]() |
Text
193210253.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (5MB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
Currently, Indonesia is experiencing various changes and improvements in the regulation of the work contract system, which is in line with the activities carried out in the oil and gas industry. The decline in production rates is one of the main problems in oil and gas production caused by damage to the production well formation, to increase it again using the Reperforated workover method by adding new perforation holes or moving layers. Seeing the poor oil and gas conditions and high Cost Recovery, the government made changes to the new contract system by increasing the amount of profit sharing for contractors that must be considered in managing oil and gas fields. The Gross Split PSC scheme is the latest oil and gas contract scheme that was first implemented in Indonesia and the world, released by the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources (ESDM). Unlike the PSC Cost Recovery contract scheme, the profit sharing between the government and the contractor in the Gross Split PSC is determined at the beginning, then the gross income is directly divided between the two according to the criteria of variable and progressive factors, which of course the contractor's profit sharing will be greater than the government's profit sharing. However, the government gets income from taxes and profit sharing. The analysis results found that the Reperforated work on the LA#1 well based on the economics of the PSC Cost Recovery and Gross Split contracts was feasible. When a comparison was made on the two contracts, the results for the Gross Split contract on the LA#1 well were more profitable than the PSC Cost Recovery contract, using an investment cost of US$ 25,443.33 with an average oil price of US$ 54.85, so that the NPV results on the PSC Cost Recovery contract were US$ 32,554 and IRR 100%, for the Gross Split scheme the NPV was US$ 98,668 and IRR 250%. From the results of the PSC Gross Split economic indicators, the results are more profitable and attractive to contractors when applied to oil and gas fields.
Item Type: | Thesis (Other) |
---|---|
Contributors: | Contribution Contributors NIDN/NIDK Sponsor Ariyon, M. 1005107603 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Reperforated, PSC Cost Recovery, Gross Split, NPV |
Subjects: | T Technology > T Technology (General) |
Divisions: | > Teknik Perminyakan |
Depositing User: | Putri Aulia Ferti |
Date Deposited: | 09 Sep 2025 03:25 |
Last Modified: | 09 Sep 2025 03:25 |
URI: | https://repository.uir.ac.id/id/eprint/28341 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |