Baihakhi, Fatur Rahman (2024) Analisis Keekonomian Perbandingan Kontrak Psc Dan Kontrak Gross Split Pada Pekerjaan Injeksi Surfactant Huff And Puff Dilapangan Venus. Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 203210010.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (2MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The huff and puff method is effective for extracting oil from reservoirs needed to maximize the amount that can be extracted by reducing oil viscosity and allowing oil to be lifted to the surface. e problems so that development is needed in order to increase oil recovery in this field is the huff and puff surfactant injection method. The use of surfactants must consider the economic aspects because the price of surfactants is relatively expensive, therefore a production sharing contract research must be carried out in order to determine the feasibility of this huff and puff surfactant injection work by comparing two contract schemes, economically valuable or feasible, Well 1 NPV value of 1,769 US $, IRR 100%, POT 0.12 Years and PI 1 for PSC Cost Recovery contract and for Gross Split obtained NPV 6. 301 US$, IRR 240%, POT 0.3 Year, and PI 3. Well 2 NPV value of 1,719 US$, IRR 90%, POT 0.4 Year, and PI 1 for PSC Cost Recovery contract and for Gross Split obtained results of 6,112 US$ for NPV, 203% for IRR and POT 0.4 Year, and PI 3. Well 3 NPV value of 1. 216 US$, IRR 70%, POT 0.17 Years, and PI 1 for PSC Cost Recovery contract and for Gross Split obtained results of 4,229 US$ for NPV, 147% for IRR and POT 0.5 Years, and PI 2. Well 4 NPV value of 1,624 US$, IRR 86%, POT 0.14 Years, and PI 1 for PSC Cost Recovery contract and for Gross Split obtained results of 5. 756 US$ for NPV, 192% for IRR, POT 0.4 Year, and PI 3. Well 5 NPV value of 1,107 US$, IRR 66%, POT 0.18 Year, and PI 1 for PSC Cost Recovery contract and for Gross Split obtained results of 3,821 US$ for NPV, 135% for IRR, POT 0.5 Year, and PI 2.

Actions (login required)

View Item