Andriana Ramadhani, Ghiva (2024) Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan (perkara No. 67/pid.b/pn.rgt). Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 201010478.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

JURIDICAL REVIEW OF THE CRIME OF FRAUD (CASE NO. 67/PID.B/PN.RGT) ABSTRACT The criminal act of fraud which has been regulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP) with various modes, one of which is fraud by shamans using the method of multiplying money, has made law enforcers increasingly have to rack their brains to be able to prove it. Besides that, fraud by shamans who multiply money occurs because many people still believe in mystical things. This is proven by the many shamanic practices that are still of interest to many people. The main problem in this research is how to apply the law to criminal acts of fraud (Case No. 67/Pid.B/PN.Rgt) and how to prove cases of criminal acts of fraud with the promise of doubling money. The research method used is Observational Research using a survey, namely interviews as a data collection tool. In this research, the author conducted direct research at research locations related to the research. The nature of descriptive research is that it provides a clear and detailed description of an incident that occurred regarding the Juridical Review of the Crime of Fraud (Case No. 67/Pid.B/PN.Rgt). Based on the research results, it is known that, the application of the law to criminal acts of fraud in Case No. 67/Pid.B/PN.Rgt, namely that when trying a case, the judge must not take sides with one party, the judge exists as an enforcer of justice. Therefore, a person who works as a judge must have high integrity and credibility. So that people will believe in the authority of a judge as an enforcer of justice. And how to prove a criminal case of fraud by promising to double the money in Case No. 67/Pid.B/PN.Rgt, namely what was done by the defendant named Sukadi Alias Adi Alias Pak De Alias Bagus Bin (deceased) Dirjo Sumarto is not regulated directly by the Criminal Code. Proof can be done by tracing cases of money duplication carried out by the perpetrator and the method of duplication. From the evidence and facts shown, Sukadi Alias Adi Alias Pak De Alias Bagus Bin (deceased) Dirjo Sumarto could not double the money according to his confession, but this was only used as a way to commit crimes in the form of fraud by getting double the money if he wanted to. following the ritual of multiplying money by withdrawing money from the supernatural using the ritual carried out by the Defendant in Case No. 67/Pid.B/PN.Rgt, the judge applied Article 378 of the Criminal Code and Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law as well as other relevant statutory regulations, namely imposing a sentence of imprisonment for 3 (three) years and 6 (six) months to the Defendant.

Actions (login required)

View Item