Putra, Arief Pratama (2025) Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 20/puu-xvii/2019 Pengujian Undang-undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum. Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 191010084.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

A quality general election is an election carried out by a general election institution that is capable of being independent, impartial, impartial, and managing election contestants in accordance with fairness and equality, understanding the technicalities of general election contestation, and professionally. This general election activity is very important, meaning it is a means by which the public can participate in carrying out political mechanisms and exercising the sovereignty that is in the hands of the people. General elections are also a way for prospective political leaders to gain legitimacy in government and are a way to start the constitutional process of replacing leaders in the state process. In this research, the aim is to analyze the Constitutional Court Decision Number 20/PUU-XVII/2019 in which there are problems involving administrative procedures and the process of holding elections, which result in the loss of citizens' constitutional rights. The research method used in this research is normative legal research by analyzing cases using library materials as the main source and the author did not conduct field investigations. Meanwhile, judging from its nature, it is descriptive analytical. The results of this research show the considerations and implications of the Constitutional Court in deciding the case of Constitutional Court Decision Number 20/PUU-XVII/2019 reviewing Law Number 7 of 2017: 1. In consideration by the constitutional court, namely: a. Article 348 paragraph (9) of Law Number 7 of 2017, the use of non-electronic KTP, certificate or other identity card which proves that the citizen has the right to vote; b. Article 210 paragraph (1) of Law Number 7 of 2017, additional voters included in the Additional Voter List (DPTb) can process transfer administration, which previously took a maximum of 30 (thirty) days to 7 (seven) days before the voting; c. Article 383 paragraph (2) of Law Number 7 of 2017, if the vote count has not been completed, the vote count can be extended without delay for a maximum of 12 (twelve) hours from the end of the vote counting hour. 2. The implications of this decision include: a. Article 348 paragraph (9) of Law Number 7 of 2017, including a certificate of recording an electronic identity card issued by the Dukcapil Office or an agency that has the authority to do so; b. Article 210 paragraph (1) of Law Number 7 of 2017, no later than 7 (seven) days before voting day; c. Article 383 paragraph (2) of Law Number 7 of 2017, states that if the vote count has not been completed, it can be extended without a break for a maximum of 12 (twelve) hours.

Actions (login required)

View Item