Dismilantas Antara Pasal 351 dan Pasal 338 KUHP yang Masuk Pada Ajaran Percobaan (studi Kasus Penikaman Di Jl. Air Dingin)

Rinaldy, Dilla Hidayati (2025) Dismilantas Antara Pasal 351 dan Pasal 338 KUHP yang Masuk Pada Ajaran Percobaan (studi Kasus Penikaman Di Jl. Air Dingin). Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 211010306.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The provision of Article 351 paragraph (2) in the stabbing case on Air Dingin Street by the Bukit Raya Sector Police in accordance with Police Report Number LP/B/352/V/2024/SPKT Polsek Bukit Raya/Polresta Pekanbaru/Polda Riau raises uncertainty because the provision of the article is not appropriate in accordance with the existing conditions. The provision of the article raises the question of how the parameters of Article 351 paragraph (2) and Article 338 actually differ from the offense of attempt. The main problem of this research is how the difference in parameters between Article 351 of the Criminal Code paragraph (2) and Article 338 of the Criminal Code which is included in the doctrine of attempted offense and whether the use of Article 351 paraghraph (2) on the example of the analyzed case applied by Bukit Raya Police is appropriate. The method used in this research is normative-empirical legal research. Normative legal research supported by interview data with informants. The data sources used are primary data sources and secondary data sources and analyzed using a qualitative approach. The result of the research on the differences in parameters between Article 351 of the Criminal Code paragraph (2) and Article 338 of the Criminal Code jo. Article 53 is in terms of the consequences caused where in Article 351 paragraph (2) the consequences caused are serious injuries while Article 338 of the Criminal Code jo. Article 53 is trying to commit a crime punishable and the difference is in “intentionally” or something that is actually known and desired by the perpetrator or the perpetrator’s malicious intent whether to kill, or persecute. And based on the results of research and discussion, it can be concluded that the application of the article in accordance with Police Report Number LP/B/352/V/2024/SPKT Polsek Bukit Raya/Polresta Pekanbaru/Polda Riau is not appropriate and should use Article 338 of the Criminal Code jo. Article 53 because with the example of the case if given the article of persecutiob resulting in serious injury does not fulfill the elements.

Actions (login required)

View Item