PENALARAN HAKIM MENERAPKAN AJARAN PENYERTAAN DALAM PUTUSAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PADA BANK RIAU-KEPRI*.

Musa, M. (2017) PENALARAN HAKIM MENERAPKAN AJARAN PENYERTAAN DALAM PUTUSAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PADA BANK RIAU-KEPRI*. Masalah - Masalah Hukum, 46 (4). pp. 349-357. ISSN 2086-2695

Text 4. 15691-44368-1-PB.pdf - Published Version Download (2MB)

Abstract

The differences of judge reasoning on the corruption cases convictions that occurs at Riau-Kepri Bank lending, appears as a problem in determining the guilty actions of the defendants participated in the case. The Basic problems studied is of the judges reasoning in determining the guilt and criminal elements, as well as the construction of reasoning of the judges in applying the teachings of inclusion. From the research findings, the action of the three defendant of Riau-Kepri Bank as credit providers were found guilty and convicted. Credit receiver was concluded free from all charges. The construction of judges reasoning, the participating actions committed by the loan recipient, can not be criminally liable due to the fulfillment of elements of tort within the scope of civil law.

Actions (login required)

View Item