Pelaksanaan Mediasi Di Pengadilan Agama Pekanbaru Pada Tahun 2017 Berdasarkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi Di Pengadilan

Yolanda, Bella Monica Seleste (2019) Pelaksanaan Mediasi Di Pengadilan Agama Pekanbaru Pada Tahun 2017 Berdasarkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi Di Pengadilan. Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 151010568.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (3MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Mediation is a way of resolving disputes through the negotiation process to obtain agreement between the parties assisted by a mediator. The purpose of mediation is to settle disputes between parties by involving third parties. From that the Religious Court provided advice to the parties so that the divorce rate in the Religious Court was reduced, then it was arranged in the Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 1 Year 2016 Mediation Procedure. The main problem in this research is how the implementation of mediation in the Pekanbaru Religious Court based on Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 and how the mediator attempts if the Mediator is unsuccessful. This study uses the method of empirical sociological law / observation (observational research) which is descriptive analysis by survey, the location selected as a place to conduct research in order to answer the problem of this thesis in the Pekanbaru Religious Court area, researchers conducted interviews with Pekanbaru Religious Court Judges and interviewing litigants. The method of drawing conclusions is used in an inductive way, namely combining the arguments that are specific to the public. The results of the mediation research in the Pekanbaru Religious Court have not gone well and have not been fulfilled according to Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 concerning mediation procedures in court. This can be seen in the case. In 2017 from 1956 cases mediated only 25 cases were successful and 495 cases which is not successful, this is evidenced by the data the author gets and can be seen from the factors of the parties who litigate both parties have both wanted divorce, one party is very strong to divorce, if the Plaintiff / Applicant is unable to forgive Defendant or Respondent.

Actions (login required)

View Item