Analisis Putusan Hakim Praperadilan Terhadap Penetapan Seseorang Sebagai Tersangka Oleh Reserse Kriminal Umum Polda Riau (studi Putusan Nomor 19/pid.prap/2016/pn.pbr)

Riduan, Riduan (2019) Analisis Putusan Hakim Praperadilan Terhadap Penetapan Seseorang Sebagai Tersangka Oleh Reserse Kriminal Umum Polda Riau (studi Putusan Nomor 19/pid.prap/2016/pn.pbr). Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 131010010.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (3MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Pretrial cases whose trials are conducted in the District Court Pekanbaru with case number 19 / Pid.prap / 2016 / PN.PBR which at the time is is declaring illegitimate a person as a suspect conducted by the Riau Regional Police Reskrimum investigator to the applicant in this case, namely H. Zailani Sianturi. Which in making the determination, there is a forced effort detention of a suspect by the defendant without being based on "preliminary evidence enough "and actions taken by the respondent to the applicant without including the Investigation Order, but only based on the Order Detention of the General Criminal Investigation Director of Riau Police Number: SP Han / 53 / X / 2016 / ReskrimUm, October 15, 2016. In the research that the authors did, the authors set a problem about verification of pretrial decisions number: 19 / pid.prap / 2016 / PN.PBR and legal consideration of the judge of the decision number: 19 / pid.prap / 2016 / PN.PBR. This writing when viewed from the type of research is classified as research normative law, namely research that examines the problems raised by the author, which consists of (3) legal materials, namely, primary, secondary and tertiary. Whereas if seen from its nature refers to the descriptive in which this study explains in clear and detailed sentences. Proof of decision number: 19 / pid.prap / 2016 / PN.PBR is done by submitting evidence before the trial in the form of letter evidence and tools witness evidence, carried out by the parties. As for the evidence presented the applicant refers to the initial arrest and detention Respondent to the applicant. The legal consideration of the judge in the a quo case that actions taken by the respondent, namely determination and detention to the respondent not in accordance with applicable legal procedures, so the application the pretrial submitted by the applicant in the trial was partially granted by the panel of judges of the Pekanbaru District Court.

Actions (login required)

View Item