Diko Situmorang, Boin (2022) Kekuatan Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia Terhadap Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 2/PUU-XIX/2021 Di PT Maybank Finance Jalan Arifin Ahmad Pekanbaru. Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.
Text
181010688.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
The decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2/PUU-XIX/2021 is a decision to decide on fiduciary guarantee cases. All judicial decisions must have legal implications for various parties. The purpose of legal research is to find out how the judge's considerations in the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 2/PUU-XIX/2021 and legal consequences for recipients of fiduciary rights. The main problem in this study is how the strength of the fiduciary guarantee certificate against the execution after the Constitutional Court decision Number 2/PUU-XIX/2021 at PT Maybank Finance Jalan Arifin Ahmad Pekanbaru and what legal remedies can be taken to defend the creditor's rights to the object of the guarantee certificate fiduciary after the Constitutional Court's decision. Number 2/PUU-XIX/2021 at PT Maybank Finance Jalan Arifin Ahmad Pekanbaru. This research was carried out using observational research methods by way of direct surveys to the field. Meanwhile, the nature of this research is descriptive, that is, describing the nature of an individual's circumstances or other symptoms in society. And in this study the authors determine the sample by means of purposive sampling. And in this study the authors used interviews and documentation as a data collection tool. Data analysis writer based on qualitative methods. As a result of the discussion of this research is PT May Bank Finance Jl. Prior to the implementation of the withdrawal, Arifin Ahmad Pekanbaru held a mediation. After that, if an agreement is not reached, then the next step is to issue a letter of withdrawal. Withdrawals in this field for some cases are still carried out by force by visiting the debtor's house. This is because some parties from the debtor default but do not voluntarily provide goods that have become the object of the fiduciary guarantee.
Item Type: | Thesis (Other) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contributors: |
|
||||||
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Execution, Fiduciary, Executorial, Default, PT Maybank Finance | ||||||
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) K Law > K Law (General) |
||||||
Divisions: | > Ilmu Hukum | ||||||
Depositing User: | Luthfi Pratama ST | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 03 Mar 2023 02:58 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 03 Mar 2023 02:58 | ||||||
URI: | http://repository.uir.ac.id/id/eprint/20658 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |