Tanggung Jawab Notaris Pengganti Terhadap Protokol Notaris Di Kabupaten Kampar

Rizky, Farkhy Octian (2021) Tanggung Jawab Notaris Pengganti Terhadap Protokol Notaris Di Kabupaten Kampar. Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 151010178.pdf - Submitted Version Download (2MB)

Abstract

The limit of authority of the substitute notary is limited to the authority given by the notary who is taking leave, based on the submission of the protocol, there is a transfer of responsibility from the notary to the substitute notary in accordance with the authority stipulated in the Law on the Position of Notary Public. With the handover of the protocol, the substitute notary is given authority from the notary he replaces. most substitute notaries find it difficult to determine the form of authority given to them. Basically there is no difference in the authority of a substitute notary, but the substitute notary's authority ends when the limit stated in his letter of office has expired, while the authority of the notary will remain until his term of office has ended. The research problems are, what is the responsibility of the substitute notary for the notary protocol in Kampar Regency, and the inhibiting factor for the responsibility of the substitute notary for the notary protocol in Kampar Regency. The research method is a type of research, namely, observational research or by survey. Meanwhile, it is descriptive in nature. The research results show that the responsibility of the substitute notary for notary protocol in Kampar Regency is the responsibility of the notary profession itself which is related to deeds, including: Civil notary responsibility for the deeds he makes. The responsibility in this case is the responsibility for the material correctness of the deed, in the construction of an illegal act, the notary's criminal responsibility for the deed he makes. Criminal in this case is a criminal act committed by a notary in his capacity as a public official who has the authority to make deeds and the notary's administrative responsibility for the deed he made. Administrative sanctions based on UUJN state there are 5 (five) types of administrative sanctions given if a Notary violates, namely: oral warning; written warning; temporary suspension; honorific dismissal; and disrespectful dismissal, and factors inhibiting the responsibility of a substitute notary public for the notary protocol in Kampar Regency are the lack of vigilance and supervision in choosing a substitute notary public, a lack of quality of laws and regulations and a code of ethics that has not been able to cover all aspects of the problem regarding the accountability of substitute notaries who Acting against the law on the deed he made, the absence of an institution that can control and supervise every action taken by a substitute notary public, legal awareness is still low for substitute notaries due to the low quality education of the substitute notary candidates, and low legal mastery namely control of the law on notary office and the notary's code of ethics in which the substitute notary is required to master the law both in theory and in its professional implementation.

Actions (login required)

View Item