Kewenangan Jaksa Pengacara Negara Sebagai Kuasa Hukum Dalam Pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (Study Kasus Putusan Perkara Nomor : 487/K/TUN/2020)

Ngadiyo, Mulyadi (2022) Kewenangan Jaksa Pengacara Negara Sebagai Kuasa Hukum Dalam Pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (Study Kasus Putusan Perkara Nomor : 487/K/TUN/2020). Masters thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 201021066.pdf - Submitted Version Download (1MB)

Abstract

For the interest of the State/regional government, the prosecutor always acts as a lawyer in defending the interests of the State/regional government. As Selat Panjang State Service in the case of a State Administration lawsuit filed submitted by Juliadi to the Regent of Selat Panjang Decree of the Regent of the Islands Meranti No. 649/HK/KPTS/X/2019 concerning ratification and appointment of heads village of Nipah Sendanu for the period 2020 - 2025 on behalf of the casino. In Judgment Pekanbaru State Administrative Court Number : Number 67/G/2019/PTUN-PBR, The judge granted Juliandi's request/complaint by canceling the letter Regent's decision. However, against the decision of the Administrative High Court In that country, there is no execution, so the court's aim is to obtaining legal certainty is not achieved. This study aims to determine the authority of the Attorney General The State represents the Regent in Implementing the Decision of the Administrative Court State Number: 67/G/2019/PTUN-PBR and to find out the implementation of the Decision State Administrative Court Number : 67/G/2019/PTUN-PBR. This type of research is normative research with the object of research is Administrative Court Decision State Number: 67/G/2019/PTUN-PBR dated 10 February 2020. As for the technique data collection is through literature review presented selectively and systematically, then the data is discussed and analyzed by descriptive method analysis.he role of the Meranti Islands District Attorney who acts as a proxy given by the Regent of the Meranti Islands as the defendant in the legal process litigation starts from the State Administrative Court in Pekanbaru up to the The appeal was to the Medan State Administrative High Court, but the final result from the litigation legal process, the Regent of the Meranti Islands was defeated by Plaintiff. Against a decision that already has permanent legal force, the next step is to live the execution process of the command as as stated in the decision of the Medan State Administrative High Court. Implementation of the Decision (Execution) of the Decision of the State Administrative Court Number : 67/G/2019/PTUN-PBR, in which the Regent of the Meranti Islands was sued by Juliadi and the suit were granted by the panel of judges who tried, however the problem is that the decision also cannot be executed. Prosecutor's Role acting as State Attorney in defending legal interests The Regent of Meranti Islands also cannot carry out the execution because he acted as State Attorney in defending the legal interests of the Regent Meranti Islands. In the future, legislation should be revise the authority of the State Attorney in defending the State (Bupati) who defeated in a court decision must provide more detail that against For the decision, the State (Regent) should apply to the Prosecutor The State Attorney (who is his proxies) first to carry out the The verdict.

Actions (login required)

View Item