Analisis Tindak Pidana Memperniagakan Kulit Trenggiling (Studi Kasus Putusan No.71/PIDB/LH/2018/PN.PLW)

Rifmayanti, Cici (2021) Analisis Tindak Pidana Memperniagakan Kulit Trenggiling (Studi Kasus Putusan No.71/PIDB/LH/2018/PN.PLW). Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Text 151010143.pdf - Submitted Version Download (7MB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Crime is currently growing. Now in committing crimes can not only be done by one person, but can also be done by more than one person and even involve law enforcement officials. The author is also interested in analyzing how the evidence of a criminal act and how the judge's consideration in providing punishment seen from the case in the Pelalawan District Court in case No. 71 / Pid.B / LH / 2018 / PN PLW. The problem discussed in this study is how the evidentiary system used by the panel of judges in case No. 71 / Pid.B / LH / 2018 / PN PLW and how the panel of judges consider the criminal case No. 71 / Pid.B / LH / 2018 / PN PLW. The research method used is the normative legal research method. The normative legal research method is library law research. This research is conducted or aimed at legal documents or materials. While its descriptive nature is that the writer tries to give a clear and complete picture of the evidence in the crime case No. 71 / Pid.B / LH / 2018 / PN PLW and the consideration of the panel of judges in deciding criminal case No. 71 / Pid.B / LH / 2018 / PN PLW as well as drawing conclusions by discussing general to specific issues Based on the results of the study, the authors conclude that the evidentiary system used in criminal case No. 71 / Pid.B / LH / 2018 / PN PLW on behalf of the defendant Ali Honopiah is a negative verification system which means the panel of judges decides the case is guided by a minimum of 2 pieces of evidence and the judge's conviction that the defendant Ali Honopiah legally and is proven to have committed a criminal act in the defense of animals. protected. It's just that the panel of judges did not make use of Article 52 of the Criminal Code which gave the panel of judges the authority to add 1/3 punishment if a criminal act was committed by a state official / law enforcer.

Actions (login required)

View Item