Analisis Yuridis Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Perkara Nomor.26/Pid.Sus/2013/PT/TPK.smg

Yanti, Evi (2019) Analisis Yuridis Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Perkara Nomor.26/Pid.Sus/2013/PT/TPK.smg. Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Preview

Text Evi Yanti.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

A country is destroyed or unsuccessful towards a welfare state not because of a shortage of natural resources (SDA) or a lack of human resources (HR), but because a country has been infected with a virus of corruption that has spread throughout the life line. is a corruption of passive bribery carried out by a judge Judge Heru Kisbandono who received bribes from one of the families of the defendants who were caught in a corruption case. The misappropriation of the official car budget of the Grobogan Regency DPRD Secretariat, with case numbers 26 / Pid.sus / 2013 / PT. TPK. Smg. The formulation of the problem in this study is Proof of acts of corruption in case No.26 / Pid.sus / 2013 / PT.TPK.Smg and legal considerations by the judges in deciding cases of corruption in cases number: 26 / Pid.sus / 2013 / PT. TPK. Smg. In view of the type of this research is Normative legal research. Whereas seen from its nature, this writing is descriptive that is in the sense of giving a picture along with a systematic explanation. Proof of criminal acts of corruption in case Number: 26 / Pid.sus / 2013 / PT.TPK.Smg is carried out by appellate judges. the defendant's actions In the primary indictment of the defendant Heru kisbandono he was charged with violating Article 12 Letter c of Law number 31 of 1999 as renewed by Law number 20 of 2001 concerning the eradication of criminal acts of corruption Jo Article 55 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with the Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning KUHAP and other articles of other laws and regulations. It has been fulfilled and proven legally and has also been linked to witness statements, letters, instructions and observations of the defendant in accordance with the provisions of the evidence in article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code which was initially submitted by the public prosecutor beginning with evidence, witness statements, expert testimony , the instructions and statements of the defendant have proceeded accordingly and correctly. Legal considerations of the Judge in giving case verdict Number: 26 / Pid.sus / 2013 / PT.TPK. The defendant has previously considered all the facts revealed at the trial including the evidence that was carried out by the public prosecutor by presenting witnesses and submitting evidence at the trial, so as to prove the guilty charges against the defendant. And the million majlis judges have considered the information from the defendant himself who acknowledged it. Before making a decision to the defendant, the panel of judges first considers the matters that determine and alleviate the defendant.

Actions (login required)

View Item