Bhaskara, Dimas Agung (2021) Tinjauan Terhadap Mekanisme Penyimpanan Dan Pemusnahan Barang Bukti Benda Sitaan Narkotika (studi Kasus Pada Kejaksaan Negeri Rokan Hilir). Other thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.
Text
171010282.pdf - Submitted Version Download (2MB) |
Abstract
ABSTRACT After a court verdict and a decision from the prosecutor's office to destroy the confiscated objects, but the implementation was not carried out directly but another action was taken in the form of storage in the state confiscated objects storage house (Rubasan) on the grounds that the number of goods to be destroyed was still in small quantities. Whereas according to the provisions of Article 91 Paragraph (2) of the Narcotics Law it has been stipulated to destroy confiscated goods in accordance with the stipulated time period, namely 7 days from the stipulation of destruction so that the prosecutor's authority over the said objects should comply with these provisions so that the implementation is in accordance with the regulations. But when the destruction is not carried out directly, there will be a discrepancy with the regulation. The main problems of the research are First, what is the procedure for storing and carrying out the destruction of confiscated narcotics evidence at the Rokan Hilir District Attorney, Second, what are the obstacles faced by the Attorney General's Office and the efforts made to overcome these obstacles in the procedure for storing and executing the destruction of confiscated narcotics at the Prosecutor's Office. Rokan Hilir State. Whereas this research method is this research is included in the type of observational research, namely by surveying or visiting directly to the research location using data collection tools, namely interviews, while the nature of the research carried out is descriptive in nature, which describes the procedures and controls in destroying Evidence. Confiscated Narcotics. The results of the author's research, namely the procedure and implementation of storing and destroying confiscated narcotics evidence at the Rokan Hilir District Prosecutor's Office, is the confiscation of evidence initially from police investigators then submitted to the District Attorney, then the Head of the State Prosecutor's Office issues a determination of evidence, and destruction of evidence after obtaining permanent legal force of the court judge within a maximum period of 7 (seven) days after receiving the judge's decision. However, in practice, the destruction of evidence which has permanent legal force is not destroyed immediately in accordance with the predetermined time limit. Obstacles Faced by the Attorney General's Office and Efforts Made to Overcome Constraints in the Procedure for Storage and Execution of Confiscated Narcotics at the Rokan Hilir District Prosecutor's Office are the obstacles, namely inadequate storage space for confiscated objects, the time given to carry out the destruction is very short. that is, proposing a budget for additional costs to the government for storing and destroying confiscated objects, and supervising confiscated objects.
Item Type: | Thesis (Other) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contributors: |
|
||||||
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Mechanism, Storage and Destruction, Narcotics | ||||||
Subjects: | L Education > L Education (General) P Language and Literature > PE English |
||||||
Divisions: | > Ilmu Hukum | ||||||
Depositing User: | Budi Santoso S.E | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 23 Jul 2022 06:22 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 23 Jul 2022 06:22 | ||||||
URI: | http://repository.uir.ac.id/id/eprint/12714 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |