PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN TERHADAP ANAK YANG MENGAKIBATKAN KEMATIAN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 35 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN ANAK (TINJAUAN TERHADAP PERKARA NO. 333/PID.SUS/2017/PN.PBR)

Hermawan, Febry (2019) PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN TERHADAP ANAK YANG MENGAKIBATKAN KEMATIAN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 35 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN ANAK (TINJAUAN TERHADAP PERKARA NO. 333/PID.SUS/2017/PN.PBR). Masters thesis, Universitas Islam Riau.

Preview

Text 171022122.pdf - Submitted Version Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Violent criminal cases that have resulted in death of children and have been decided by the Pekanbaru District Court create a sense of injustice that occurs in law enforcement against child cases. This is stated in the case register No. 333 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / PN.Pbr. The perpetrators of violence against children that resulted in death were none other than the manager and also the owner of the Orphanage named Hj. Lili Nurhayati. The perpetrator beats several times against the victim so that the victim experiences fever and vomiting. Based on the above background, the problem that will be answered in this thesis research is How Judge's Consideration of the Case of Violence Against Children in Case No. 333 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / PN.Pbr. What Is the Ideal Law Enforcement By the Judges of the Pekanbaru District Court in Providing Decision Against Case No. 333 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / PN.Pbr Against Perpetrators of Violent Crimes Against Children This type of research is an observational survey by survey, which is research that takes data directly from the population / respondent by conducting interviews as a data collection tool, then from the data taken is processed so that conclusions are obtained by deductive method. Meanwhile, if seen from its nature, this research is descriptive in nature, research that explains in clear and detailed sentence form. Judge's Consideration Against Criminal Act Against Children in Case No. 333 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / PN.Pbr that the Panel of Judges of the Pekanbaru District Court has taken into consideration the perpetrators, who according to the Judge's Thesis that the perpetrators have been proven to have violated Article 80 paragraph (1) of Law No. 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law No. 23 of 2002 concerning Protection of Children, where the perpetrators stated in the trial have neglected or neglected children, and for the actions of the perpetrators, the Panel of Judges of the Pekanbaru District Court, sentenced the prison to 4 (four) years and 3 (three) months for the Defendant and Ideally Law Enforcement By the Judges of the Pekanbaru District Court in Providing Decision Against Case No. 333 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / PN.Pbr that the construction of thinking the Panel of Judges in giving consideration should apply Article 80 paragraph (3) of Law No. 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law No. 23 of 2002 concerning Protection of Children concerning Criminal Procedure Law, namely the Defendant has committed a violent crime against children resulting in death and this has been proven by the existence of Visum Et Repertum Number: VER / 11 / I / 2017 / RSB, dated January 28, 2017 which in essence the victim has suffered blisters on the face and abdomen, bruises on the back and waist due to blunt force. So from the results of these considerations, the Panel of Judges of the Pekanbaru District Court has incorrectly applied the law to the Defendant, because after all the injustice given by the Judge in conducting the trial is the responsibility of the Judge to the community as justice seekers.

Actions (login required)

View Item